Forbear is a Homophone: Lexical Prosody Does Not Constrain Lexical Access
- 1 July 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Language and Speech
- Vol. 29 (3) , 201-220
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098602900302
Abstract
Because stress can occur in any position within an English word, lexical prosody could serve as a minimal distinguishing feature between pairs of words. However, most pairs of English words with stress pattern opposition also differ vocalically: OBject and obJECT, CONtent and conTENT have different vowels in their first syllables as well as different stress patterns. To test whether prosodic information is made use of in auditory word recognition independently of segmental phonetic information, it is necessary to examine pairs like FORbear — forBEAR or TRUSty — trusTEE, semantically unrelated words which exhibit stress pattern opposition but no segmental difference. In a cross-modal priming task, such words produce the priming effects characteristic of homophones, indicating that lexical prosody is not used in the same way as segmental structure to constrain lexical access.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1984
- Cracking the dual code: toward a unitary model of phoneme identificationJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1983
- Voicing, vowel, and stress mispronunciations in continuous speechPerception & Psychophysics, 1983
- Introduction. Models and Measurements in the Study of ProsodyPublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- Speech perception: a model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical accessJournal of Phonetics, 1979
- Perceptibility of phonetic features in fluent speechThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978
- On the Role of Sentence Stress in Sentence ProcessingLanguage and Speech, 1977
- Lexical access and naming timeJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973
- The “tip of the tongue” phenomenonJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966
- Some Effects of Semantic and Grammatical Context on the Production and Perception of SpeechLanguage and Speech, 1963