The Biomechanical Basis of Vertebral Body Fragility in Men and Women
Open Access
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 16 (12) , 2276-2283
- https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.12.2276
Abstract
The aim of this study was to quantify the biomechanical basis for vertebral fracture risk in elderly men and women. A bone is likely to fracture when the loads imposed are similar to or greater than its strength. To quantify this risk, we developed a fracture risk index (FRI) based on the ratio of the vertebral body compressive load and strength. Loads were determined by upper body weight, height, and the muscle moment arm, and strength was estimated from cross-sectional area (CSA) and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD). With loads less than the strength of the bone, the FRI remains p < 0.001). However, because CSA also was higher in men than women, peak load per unit CSA (stress) did not differ by gender (317.4 ± 4.7 N/cm2 vs. 321.9 ± 3.3 N/cm2, NS). The FRI was similar in young men and women and well below unity (0.42 ± 0.02 vs. 0.43 ± 0.01; NS). Gender differences emerged during aging; CSA increased in both men and women but more so in men, so load per unit area (stress) diminished but more so in men than in women. vBMD decreased in both genders but less so in men. These changes were captured in the FRI, which increased by only 21% in men and by 102% in women so that only 9% of elderly men but 26% of elderly women had an FRI ≥ 1. Men and women with vertebral fractures had an FRI that was greater than or equal to unity (1.03 ± 0.13 vs. 1.35 ± 0.13; p < 0.05) and was 2.04 SD and 2.26 SD higher than age-matched men and women, respectively. In summary and conclusion, young men and women have a similar vBMD, vertebral stress, and FRI. During aging, CSA increases more, and vBMD decreases less in men than in women. Thus, fewer men than women are at risk for fracture because fewer men than women have these structural determinants of bone strength below a level at which the loads exceed the bone's ability to tolerate them. Men and women with vertebral fractures have FRIs that are equal to or exceed unity. The results show that a fracture threshold for vertebrae can be defined using established biomechanical principles; whether this approach has greater sensitivity and specificity than the current BMD T score of −2.5 SD is unknown.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sexual Dimorphism in Vertebral Fragility Is More the Result of Gender Differences in Age-Related Bone Gain Than Bone LossJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2001
- Age- and Gender-Related Differences in Vertebral Bone Mass, Density, and StrengthJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1999
- A Unitary Model for Involutional Osteoporosis: Estrogen Deficiency Causes Both Type I and Type II Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women and Contributes to Bone Loss in Aging MenJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1998
- Bone mass, areal, and volumetric bone density are equally accurate, sensitive, and specific surrogates of the breaking strength of the vertebral body: An in vitro studyJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1996
- Letter to the editorBone, 1996
- Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosisJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1994
- The relationship between EMG activity and extensor moment generation in the erector spinae muscles during bending and lifting activitiesJournal of Biomechanics, 1993
- Biologically meaningful determinants of the in vitro strength of lumbar vertebraeBone, 1991
- The Microanatomy of Trabecular Bone Loss in Normal Aging Men and WomenClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1987
- Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1981