Substitution and Dropout Bias in Social Experiments: A Study of an Influential Social Experiment

Preprint
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
    • preprint
      • Published in RePEc
Abstract
This paper considers the interpretation of evidence from social experiments when persons randomized out of a program being evaluated have good substitutes for it, and when persons randomized into a program drop out to pursue better alternatives. Using data from an experimental evaluation of a classroom training program, we document the empirical importance of control group substitution and treatment group dropping out. Evidence that one program is ineffective relative to close substitutes is not evidence that the type of service provided by all of the programs is ineffective, although that is the way experimental evidence is often interpreted. (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
All Related Versions

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: