ORCHIECTOMY AND ORCHIECTOMY PLUS MITOMYCIN C FOR METASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER IN PATIENTS WITH POOR PROGNOSIS: THE FINAL RESULTS OF A EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR RESEARCH IN CANCER THERAPY GENITOURINARY GROUP TRIAL
- 1 November 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 162 (5) , 1658-1665
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68191-8
Abstract
The outcome of patients with symptomatic metastatic prostate cancer is poor and improved treatment regimens are urgently needed. Theoretically, the combination of orchiectomy and chemotherapy could reduce androgen sensitive and insensitive cells in the prostate. This European Organization for Research in Cancer Therapy Genitourinary Group randomized, multicenter phase III trial demonstrates the outcome of orchiectomy alone versus orchiectomy followed by intravenous mitomycin C. A total of 189 patients with metastatic prostate cancer and poor prognostic factors were randomized in this trial by 42 institutions. Of these patients 184 (97%) were eligible for study, including 90 treated with orchiectomy alone (orchiectomy only arm) and 94 treated with orchiectomy followed by 15 mg./m.2 mitomycin C in 1 week (combined treatment arm). Mitomycin C was administered every 6 weeks and treatment was continued as long as tolerance and patient compliance allowed, and no progression was observed. Objective and subjective criteria for progression were clearly defined in the protocol. Patient and tumor characteristics were well balanced between the 2 treatment arms. At a median followup of 4.2 years 144 patients had died, including 112 of prostate cancer. No significant differences for time to overall (p = 0.17), subjective (p = 0.25) and objective (p = 0.08) progression were found between the 2 treatment groups. For progression-free survival no difference was noted (p = 0.67) between the 2 treatment groups but a trend in favor of orchiectomy alone was observed for overall survival (p = 0.04). Mitomycin C induced considerable hematological, gastrointestinal, renal and pulmonary toxicity leading to discontinuation in 31% of patients with pulmonary toxicity and 7% with renal deterioration. In addition, the quality of life evaluation revealed significant reduction in the combined treatment arm. Based on the results of this randomized phase III study orchiectomy plus mitomycin C for metastatic prostate cancer in patients with poor prognostic factors cannot be recommended due to failure of improvement in survival and reduced quality of life parameters.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combined hormono/chemotherapy as primary treatment for metastatic prostate cancer: A randomized, multicenter study of orchiectomy alone versus orchiectomy plus estramustine phosphateUrology, 1997
- Comparison of Hormonal Therapy and Chemohormonal Therapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Clinical Stage D Prostatic CancerInternational Journal of Urology, 1996
- Intermittent androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer: A preliminary reportUrology, 1995
- Chemo‐endocrine therapy in patients with stage D2 prostate cancerThe Prostate, 1995
- Experience in advanced prostatic cancer: Orchiectomy and flutamide versus orchiectomy and estramustine phosphateUrology, 1994
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Combined versus sequential chemo-endocrine therapy in advanced prostate cancer: final results of a randomized Southwest Oncology Group study.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1990
- Mitomycin-C in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer: report on an EORTC phase II studyWorld Journal of Urology, 1986
- Early combined hormonal and chemotherapy for metastatic prostatic carcinomaUrology, 1983
- INTRAVASCULAR HÆMOLYSIS AND RENAL IMPAIRMENT AFTER BLOOD TRANSFUSION IN TWO PATIENTS ON LONG-TERM 5-FLUOROURACIL AND MITOMYCIN-CThe Lancet, 1980