Stimulating Energy Conservation by Sharing the Savings: A Community-Based Approach
- 1 April 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Vol. 20 (4) , 517-534
- https://doi.org/10.1068/a200517
Abstract
In this paper a novel shared-savings approach to residential energy conservation is evaluated. By the use of data on preretrofit and postretrofit energy consumption, a normalization procedure to control for weather, and control groups, it is concluded that the shared-savings program (RECAP) has reduced annual electricity consumption by 1556 kWh per household, or 6.6% of preretrofit consumption. Energy savings differ markedly across the four communities served by RECAP, and are only weakly associated with installation costs. Savings are greater where audits are used to select participants with significant potential for conservation; households with large preretrofit electricity consumption generate particularly large savings. Regression analysis of survey data suggests that the net impact of behavioral and household changes upon electricity savings is minimal.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electricity use and savings in the Hood River Conservation ProjectPublished by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) ,1987
- A midwest low-income weatherization program seen through PRISMEnergy and Buildings, 1986
- PRISM: An introductionEnergy and Buildings, 1986
- Evaluating the impact of two energy conservation programmes in a midwestern cityApplied Geography, 1985
- Spatially-Oriented Energy Consumption Scenarios: Method and Application to HollandPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- The Urban Geography of Residential Energy ConsumptionPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- Geographical Dimensions of EnergyPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- Household Energy Conservation: A Review of the Federal Residential Conservation ServicePublic Administration Review, 1984
- Residential Conservation Program ImpactsEvaluation Review, 1983