A comparison of manual and automated methods of measuring airway resistance and thoracic gas volume.
- 1 February 1977
- Vol. 32 (1) , 60-66
- https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.32.1.60
Abstract
An automated method of measuring airways resistance (Raw) and thoracic gas volume (Vtg) by whole body plethysmography using a digital computer is described. The results obtained by this method are compared with those obtained by an experienced observer and the results of consistency tests on the 2 methods are given. There was wide variability in the values of Raw obtained using each method, and no significant differences were found between the 2 methods. The values of Vtg obtained by them were highly correlated, but the results obtained manually were higher than those obtained automatically by an amount proportional to the volume. The consistency of the computer measurements was greater than that of the manual method. A significant decrease between successive measurements of Raw in some subjects was noted in the manual observations but not in those derived from the automated method. The new method is suitable for the rapid determination of Raw and Vtg.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pulmonary function and sulphur dioxide, some preliminary findingsEnvironmental Research, 1975
- Air pollution and pulmonary airway resistance: A pilot studyEnvironmental Research, 1973
- Design of a body plethysmograph for studying cardiopulmonary physiologyJournal of Applied Physiology, 1959
- A NEW METHOD FOR MEASURING AIRWAY RESISTANCE IN MAN USING A BODY PLETHYSMOGRAPH: VALUES IN NORMAL SUBJECTS AND IN PATIENTS WITH RESPIRATORY DISEASE 1Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1956
- A RAPID PLETHYSMOGRAPHIC METHOD FOR MEASURING THORACIC GAS VOLUME: A COMPARISON WITH A NITROGEN WASHOUT METHOD FOR MEASURING FUNCTIONAL RESIDUAL CAPACITY IN NORMAL SUBJECTS 1Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1956