Intraparty Democracy and the Selection of Parliamentary Candidates: the Belgian Case
- 1 April 1974
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 4 (2) , 163-185
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400009455
Abstract
Leaders and activists in most Western political parties, appreciating Schattschneider's adage1 that parties are controlled by those who control nominations to public offices, jealously guard their right to choose parliamentary candidates. They realize that candidates play a crucial role in shaping voters’ images of the parties as well as in formulating the party policies. Not surprisingly, candidates are usually recruited through rather oligarchical procedures. Extra-parliamentary party leaders normally pick the nominees in closed private meetings and then submit their choices to rank-and-file party members and/or delegates who nearly always grant their approval. Such procedures reduce the role of party members to one of docile acquiescence, and completely exclude party voters.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Role of National Party Leaders in the Selection of Parliamentary Candidates: The Belgian CaseComparative Politics, 1973
- The Representativeness of Primary ElectoratesMidwest Journal of Political Science, 1968
- The General Elections as a Process of Powerachievement in the Belgian Political SystemRes Publica, 1967
- Congressional Recruitment and RepresentationAmerican Political Science Review, 1966
- Political Recruitment and Party Structure: A Case StudyAmerican Political Science Review, 1961