Occupational contact dermatitis in 2 dental technicians
- 1 May 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Contact Dermatitis
- Vol. 22 (5) , 282-287
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1990.tb01597.x
Abstract
2 dental technicians, both with chronic hand eczema, reported worsening from the use of 2 products containing methyl methacrylate, employed in manufacturing acryline prostheses. Patch tests in both patients gave positive reactions in methyl methacrylate, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate and products employed in manufacturing acrylic prostheses (2% and 5% pet.). On the basis of results subsequently obtained from patch tests carried out with pieces of glove interposed between the skin and the allergens (methyl methacrylate and products employed), we advised our patients still to use latex gloves during work. Follow-up after 1 year showed complete regression of the dermatitis in I case and considerable improvement in the other.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contact stomatitis due to methyl methacrylate monomerContact Dermatitis, 1989
- Contact allergy to denture materials in the burning mouth syndromeContact Dermatitis, 1988
- Contact dermatitis to methyl methacrylateContact Dermatitis, 1984
- Allergic stomatitis from acrylic compoundsContact Dermatitis, 1983
- Cross reactions between methyl methacrylate monomer and acrylic monomers presently used in acrylic nail preparationsContact Dermatitis, 1980
- Skin problems associated with multifunctional acrylic monomers in ultraviolet curing inksBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1978
- Butyl methacrylate monomer and ethyl methacrylate monomer – frequency of reactionContact Dermatitis, 1978
- SENSITIZATION POTENTIALS OF METHYL, ETHYL, AND n-BUTYL METHACRYLATES AND MUTUAL CROSS-SENSITIVITY IN GUINEA PIGSJournal of Investigative Dermatology, 1977
- Cross‐sensitization patterns in acrylate allergiesContact Dermatitis, 1975
- Contact Dermatitis from Penetration of Rubber Gloves by Acrylic MonomerBMJ, 1971