What is hypertension in chronic haemodialysis? The role of interdialytic blood pressure monitoring

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background. Hypertension in chronic haemodialysis patients contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality. Treatment decisions are usually based on predialysis readings, which may not accurately reflect control during the interdialytic period. Methods. We studied 40 randomly selected subjects on haemodialysis and compared readings by different methods at set times during the dialysis session with the 48-h interdialytic ambulatory readings. Conventional sphygmomanometer, automated Dinamap and Tm 2421(A&D) ambulatory monitor were used for BP measurements. Results. Conventional sphygmomanometry and self measured automatic readings (Dinamap) were highly correlated (systolic r=0.93, Pr=0.90, P0) 158 mmHg systolic, 80 mmHg diastolic and 106 mmHg mean) significantly overestimated the mean ambulatory reading during the 6 h prior to attendance ((preAm6h) systolic 147 (PPP20/10 mmHg) between the PreC0 and preAm6h (white-coat effect) persisting in seven patients (19%) after a period of rest 10 min predialysis (preC10) and present even in self-recorded Dinamap readings. There was a significant negative relationship between the systolic rise and the number of months on dialysis (P20) for systolic, diastolic, and mean, unlike predialysis (PreC0 and preC10), onset (onC) and end of dialysis readings (enC) did not differ significantly from 48 h interdialytic means. Conclusions. The best representation of interdialytic pressure was the 20-min post-dialysis reading. Walk-in predialysis pressures overestimate mean interdialytic pressures due to a high incidence of white-coat effect, which shows some habituation with time on dialysis. Ambulatory monitoring has a role in evaluating persistent poor blood pressure control in haemodialysis patients.