Why reports of outcome evaluations are often biased or uninterpretable
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Evaluation and Program Planning
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-9
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(93)90032-4
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A meta-analysis and theoretical review of school based tobacco and alcohol intervention programsPsychology & Health, 1988
- Guidelines for Monitoring the Scientific Competence of Preventive Intervention Research CentersKnowledge, 1987
- Data CollectionSociological Methods & Research, 1985
- Psychosocial approaches to smoking prevention: A review of findings.Health Psychology, 1985
- Treatment Implementation and Statistical PowerEvaluation Review, 1982
- Process AnalysisEvaluation Review, 1981
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981
- Sensitivity, bias, and theory in impact evaluations.Professional Psychology, 1977
- Increasing the validity of self-reports of behavior in a smoking in children investigation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- The Effect of Experimental Mortality on the Internal and External Validity of the Randomized Comparative ExperimentThe Journal of Experimental Education, 1971