Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal vs radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 15 (3) , 289-292
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000306
Abstract
In a retrospective study, we compared a laparoscopic radical vaginal approach with abdominal radical hysterectomy type II for treatment of patients with cervical cancer at International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I to III.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic Para-aortic and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Experience with 150 Patients and Review of the LiteratureGynecologic Oncology, 1998
- Laparoscopic Assistance for Extended Radicality of Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy: Description of a TechniqueGynecologic Oncology, 1998
- Wertheim-Meigs or Schauta-Amreich hysterectomyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1994
- Complications of staging laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy.1993
- The role of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the management of cervical carcinomaGynecologic Oncology, 1992
- Anatomical study of para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes in gynecologic malignancies.1992
- Class II radical hysterectomy shows less morbidity and good treatment efficacy compared to class IIIGynecologic Oncology, 1991
- [Radical hysterectomies by the Schauta-Amreich and Schauta-Stoeckel techniques assisted by celioscopy].1991
- [Does endoscopic surgery have a role in radical surgery of cancer of the cervix uteri?].1990
- Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer.1974