Social change and conservation misrepresentation in Africa
- 1 October 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Oryx
- Vol. 32 (04) , 265-276
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605300030064
Abstract
Concomitant with the increasing denouncement of African game legislation as inappropriate law imposed by a former colonial authority, is the attack upon traditional, i.e. total protection, practice of conservation. It is increasingly argued by a school of neo-populist thinkers, that local people should be allowed to exploit protected areas in accordance with their own traditions and beliefs. Examples of alleged injustice or practice are consistently misrepresented with a view to replacing traditional conservation practice with left-wing political dogma, proponents claiming a mandate from the Caracas 1992 IVth World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The rule of law and African game – a review of some recent trends and concernsOryx, 1996
- Segregation effects and the impoverishment of savanna parks: the case for ecosystem viability analysisAfrican Journal of Ecology, 1993
- The Global Environment Facility and biodiversity conservation: lessons to date and suggestions for future actionBiodiversity and Conservation, 1993
- Bureaucratic Domination of Hunter‐Gatherer Societies: A Study of the San in BotswanaDevelopment and Change, 1993
- Post-Settlement History of Human Land-Use and Vegetation Dynamics of a Tsuga Canadensis (Hemlock) Woodlot in Central New EnglandJournal of Ecology, 1992
- Disturbance, Diversity, and Invasion: Implications for ConservationConservation Biology, 1992
- Radical American Environmentalism and Wilderness PerservationEnvironmental Ethics, 1989
- The Mountain People: some notes on the Ik of north-eastern UgandaAfrica, 1985
- Moremi Wildlife Reserve, OkavangoOryx, 1963