Log-Linear Models for Contingency Table Analysis
- 1 February 1979
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Methods & Research
- Vol. 7 (3) , 330-336
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004912417900700304
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the interpretation of fitted log-linear models in contingency table analysis. The two most commonly used alternatives are the direct interpretation of the estimated coefficients of the fitted model and the interpretation of statistics, such as odds ratios, based upon the expected cell frequencies under the fitted model. There are strong reasons for preferring the latter since the statistics will be the same whatever computer program is used to fit the model whereas the estimated parameter coefficients will depend upon the set of constraints used to solve the normal equations. Thus, different computer programs can (correctly) provide different parameter estimates from the same data whereas statistics such as odds ratios based upon the expected cell frequencies will be unaffected. Interpretation based upon the estimated parameters of the fitted model is therefore potentially misleading. These problems are not unique to log-linear analysis but occur in analyses involving the generalized linear model.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- INTERPRETATION OF GOODMAN'S LOG-LINEAR MODEL EFFECTS An Odds Ratio ApproachSociological Methods & Research, 1977
- A Reformulation of Linear ModelsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1977
- The Analysis of Contingency TablesPublished by Springer Nature ,1977
- Partitioning of Chi-Square, Analysis of Marginal Contingency Tables, and Estimation of Expected Frequencies in Multidimensional Contingency TablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1971
- The Analysis of Multidimensional Contingency Tables: Stepwise Procedures and Direct Estimation Methods for Building Models for Multiple ClassificationsTechnometrics, 1971
- The Multivariate Analysis of Qualitative Data: Interactions among Multiple ClassificationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1970