Interrupted or Continuous Slowly Absorbable Sutures For Closure of Primary Elective Midline Abdominal Incisions
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 249 (4) , 576-582
- https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31819ec6c8
Abstract
In patients undergoing midline incisions, the abdominal fascia can be closed with a continuous or interrupted suture using various materials. The aim of this study is to compare: (1) interrupted technique with rapidly absorbable sutures and (2) continuous techniques with different slowly absorbable sutures, focusing on the incidence of incisional hernias within 1 year. A meta-analysis suggested that the incidence of incisional hernias can be more effectively reduced with slowly absorbable continuous sutures. Multicenter randomized surgical trial with 3 parallel groups. Patients were scheduled for primary elective midline incisions. All surgeons were trained (4:1 suture wound length in continuous groups) and monitored. Primary end point, measured within 1 year after surgery, was the frequency of incisional hernias diagnosed by clinical examination and confirmed by ultrasound. Complications and safety were used as secondary end points. This study has been registered with the ISRCTN Register (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541). Conducted on 625 randomized patients (210 interrupted Vicryl, 205 continuous polydioxanone suture (PDS), 210 continuous Monoplus), the primary analysis showed an incidence of 28 incisional hernias (15.9%) versus 15 (8.4%) versus 22 (12.5%) for the 3 closure techniques, respectively (P = 0.09). No significant difference was observed between the 3 groups with regard to burst abdomen (4 [2.0%] vs. 6 [3.0%] vs. 8 [4.0%], P = 0.46), wound infection (26 [12.7%] vs. 39 [19.4%] vs. 33 [16.3%], P = 0.19), pulmonary infections (9 [4.4%] vs. 5 [2.5%] vs. 5 [2.5%], P = 0.46), serious adverse events (63 [30.0%] vs. 57 [27.8%] vs. 61 [29.1%], P = 0.89), and 1-year mortality (16 [7.9%] vs. 11 [5.5%] vs. 16 [7.9%], P = 0.54). The incidence of incisional hernias and the frequency of wound infection was higher than expected in all groups. New concepts need to be developed and studied to substantially reduce the frequency of incisional hernias.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of the ethical review process for non-pharmacological multicentre studies in Germany on the basis of a randomised surgical trialJournal of Medical Ethics, 2007
- Operative standardization in randomized controlled surgical trialsDer Chirurg, 2006
- Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures – Design of a multi-centre randomised trial to evaluate abdominal closure techniques INSECT-Trial [ISRCTN24023541]BMC Surgery, 2005
- Evaluating Meta-analyses in the General Surgical LiteratureAnnals of Surgery, 2005
- Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Suture Versus Mesh Repair of Incisional HerniaAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Have Outcomes of Incisional Hernia Repair Improved With Time?Annals of Surgery, 2003
- Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisionsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2002
- The Search for an Ideal Method of Abdominal Fascial ClosureAnnals of Surgery, 2000
- Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysisThe American Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: Results of a randomized trialBritish Journal of Surgery, 1987