Evolutionary Relationships of Apusomonads Inferred from Taxon-Rich Analyses of 6 Nuclear Encoded Genes
Open Access
- 18 September 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Vol. 23 (12) , 2455-2466
- https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msl120
Abstract
The phylogenetic relationships of the biflagellate protist group Apusomonadidae have been unclear despite the availability of some molecular data. We analyzed sequences from 6 nuclear encoded genes—small-subunit rRNA, large-subunit rRNA, α-tubulin, β-tubulin, actin, and heat shock protein 90—to infer the phylogenetic position of Apusomonas proboscidea Aléxéieff 1924. To increase the taxon richness of the study, we also obtained new sequences from representatives of several other major eukaryotic groups: Chrysochromulina sp. National Institute for Environmental Studies 1333 (Haptophyta), Cyanophora paradoxa (Glaucophyta), Goniomonas truncata (Cryptophyceae), Leucocryptos marina (Kathablepharidae), Mesostigma viride (Streptophyta, Viridiplantae), Peridinium limbatum (Alveolata), Pterosperma cristatum (Prasinophytae, Viridiplantae), Synura sphagnicola (Stramenopiles), and Thaumatomonas sp. (Rhizaria). In most individual gene phylogenies, Apusomonas branched close to either of the 2 related taxa—Opisthokonta (including animals, fungi, and choanoflagellates) or Amoebozoa. Combined analyses of all 4 protein-coding genes or all 6 studied genes strongly supported the hypothesis that Apusomonadidae is closely related to Opisthokonta (or to all other eukaryotic groups except Opisthokonta, depending on the position of the eukaryotic root). Alternative hypotheses were rejected in approximately unbiased tests at the 5% level. However, the strong phylogenetic signal supporting a specific affiliation between Apusomonadidae and Opisthokonta largely originated from the α-tubulin data. If α-tubulin is not considered, topologies in which Apusomonadidae is sister to Opisthokonta or is sister to Amoebozoa were more or less equally supported. One current model for deep eukaryotic evolution holds that eukaryotes are divided into primary “unikont” and “bikont” clades and are descended from a “uniflagellate” common ancestor. Together with other information, our data suggest instead that unikonts (=Opisthokonta and Amoebozoa) are not strictly monophyletic and are descended from biflagellate ancestors.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- The New Higher Level Classification of Eukaryotes with Emphasis on the Taxonomy of ProtistsThe Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 2005
- Inference of the Phylogenetic Position of Oxymonads Based on Nine Genes: Support for Metamonada and ExcavataMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2005
- Myosin domain evolution and the primary divergence of eukaryotesNature, 2005
- The Opisthokonta and the Ecdysozoa May Not Be Clades: Stronger Support for the Grouping of Plant and Animal than for Animal and Fungi and Stronger Support for the Coelomata than EcdysozoaMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2005
- Root of the Eukaryota Tree as Inferred from Combined Maximum Likelihood Analyses of Multiple Molecular Sequence DataMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2004
- Molecular phylogeny of Amoebozoa and the evolutionary significance of the unikont PhalansteriumEuropean Journal of Protistology, 2004
- Protist phylogeny and the high-level classification of ProtozoaEuropean Journal of Protistology, 2003
- Opinion: Long Branch Attraction and Protist PhylogenyProtist, 2000
- Molecular phylogeny of the stress-70 protein family with reference to algal relationshipsEuropean Journal of Phycology, 1997
- Centriole maturation in the amoebae ofPhysarum polycephalumProtoplasma, 1980