TENUOUS RELATIONSHIPS
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Gender & Society
- Vol. 13 (6) , 758-780
- https://doi.org/10.1177/089124399013006005
Abstract
The relatively recent shift of family caregiving to the public market of service work raises questions about how to theorize paid caregiving. This article examines how to conceptualize child rearing when it is transferred to a paid worker. The gendered character of commodified caregiving is complicated by structural locations of race and class that define the employer-employee relationship. Previous discussions of paid child care work as emotionally meaningful work have been criticized as idealizations that mask the exploitative nature of the work. Yet, emotional meaning is not simply a cover-up or an idealization of the labor; rather, it is an integral component of the work of caregiving, the practice of which is distorted by societal assumptions about gender and race. To better understand paid child care work, the significance of emotional meaning, as well as gender, race, and ethnic dimensions of paid child care work need to be explored.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Typology of Approaches to Child CareJournal of Family Issues, 1997
- CHILD CARE AS WOMEN'S WORKGender & Society, 1996
- CUSTODIAL CARE, SURROGATE CARE, AND COORDINATED CAREGender & Society, 1996
- DOING DIFFERENCEGender & Society, 1995
- The Hidden Organization of Labor: Gender, Race/Ethnicity and Child-Care Work in the Formal and Informal EconomySociological Perspectives, 1994
- Gender, Class, and Motherhood: The Legacy of Federal Child Care PolicyAffilia, 1992
- Meeting the child care needs of low-income familiesChild & Youth Care Forum, 1992
- Invisible WorkSocial Problems, 1987
- Doing GenderGender & Society, 1987
- The Political Economy of Women's LiberationMonthly Review, 1969