Formative and Process Evaluation of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Programs
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 17 (2) , 204-220
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9301700205
Abstract
This article discusses the concepts of formative and process evaluation, and their application in the field of health promotion and disease prevention. Process evaluation fulfills the need for information on program implementation, which is important in interpreting program outcomes, and informing future efforts in similar areas. Formative evaluation aims to help develop and improve programs from an early stage, when opportunities for influence are likely to be greatest. Greater application of formative and process evaluation to such programs in thefuture has the potential to lead to better designed and more effective programs, and improved understanding of the factors influencing program outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of Heartbeat New ZealandHealth Promotion International, 1991
- Evaluation in health education. A review of progress, possibilities, and problems.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1990
- A process evaluation of a two-year community cardiovascular risk reduction program: what was done and who knew about it?Health Education Research, 1990
- The development and formative evaluation of a homebased intervention to reduce passive smoking by infantsHealth Education Research, 1989
- A COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT ON ALCOHOL: COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION AND ITS EVALUATIONCommunity Health Studies, 1989
- Roles of the Evaluator in Innovative ProgramsEvaluation Review, 1988
- A framework for evaluating community-based heart disease prevention programsSocial Science & Medicine, 1986
- Formative Evaluation of Gifted Programs: A Process and ModelGifted Child Quarterly, 1985
- Assessing Treatment Implementation Amid the Slings and Arrows of RealityEvaluation Review, 1984
- A Structure for Formative Evaluation in Product DevelopmentReview of Educational Research, 1973