Randomized Comparison of Oral Misoprostol and Oxytocin for Labor Induction in Term Prelabor Membrane Rupture
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 94 (6) , 994-999
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-199912000-00017
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction*1Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: A randomized controlled trialPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administrationObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Oral or vaginal misoprostol for induction of laborInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1997
- Cervical Priming With Oral Misoprostol in Pre-Labor Rupture of Membranes at TermObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Induction of Labor Compared with Expectant Management for Prelabor Rupture of the Membranes at TermNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Prostaglandin E2 for induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes at termAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1992
- The labour agentry scale: Psychometric properties of an instrument measuring control during childbirthResearch in Nursing & Health, 1987
- Expectant Management of Rupture of Membranes at TermSouthern Medical Journal, 1986