Measurement of self reported active exposure to cigarette smoke
Open Access
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- theory and-methods
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 55 (9) , 674-680
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.55.9.674
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE The number of cigarettes smoked per day is an imprecise indicator of exposure to cigarette smoke, and biochemical assessment of exposure is not always feasible. The aim of this study was to develop more accurate measures of self reported active exposure to cigarette smoke. DESIGN Mail survey in 386 smokers, retest at one month in 94 participants (24%), analysis of saliva cotinine in 98 participants (25%), collection of empty cigarette packs in 214 participants (55%), collection of cigarette butts in 107 participants (28%). Ten questions and items intended to assess active exposure to cigarette smoke were tested and compared with saliva cotinine, the Fagerström test for nicotine dependence, and self rated dependence. SETTING A population sample in Geneva, Switzerland, in 1999. PARTICIPANTS 323 daily smokers and 63 occasional smokers. MAIN RESULTS Measures that were associated with saliva cotinine included the number of cigarettes smoked per day (r 2=0.36), smoking intensity (r 2=0.40), the type of cigarettes smoked (regular versus light) (r 2=0.04), smoking when ill (r 2=0.15) and a single item rating of the total quantity of smoke inhaled (r 2=0.27). A multivariate model combining the first four items explained the largest proportion of the variance in cotinine (r 2=0.63), substantially more than was explained by the number of cigarettes per day alone, by 75% in all smokers and by 110% in daily smokers. CONCLUSIONS The study identified measures of exposure to smoke that reflect saliva cotinine better than the number of cigarettes per day. These measures can be used in studies of the dose related risk of smoking and in smoking reduction studies.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reduced smoking: an introduction and review of the evidenceAddiction, 2000
- Biomarkers of environmental tobacco smoke exposure.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1999
- Are self-reports of smoking rate biased? Evidence from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Is Serum Cotinine a Better Measure of Cigarette-Smoking Than Self-Report?Preventive Medicine, 1995
- The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance QuestionnaireBritish Journal of Addiction, 1991
- Titrating exposure to tobacco smoke using cotinine—a minefield of misunderstandingsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- A rapid gas-liquid chromatographic method for the determination of cotinine and nicotine in biological fluidsJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1990
- Self-selected blocking of vents on low-yield cigarettesPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1989
- Validity of smokers' information about present and past cigarette brands--implications for studies of the effects of falling tar yields of cigarettes on health.Thorax, 1986
- Relationship between cigarette yields, puffing patterns, and smoke intake: evidence for tar compensation?BMJ, 1982