General practitioners and the pull of prevention.
- 1 November 1984
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Sociology of Health & Illness
- Vol. 6 (3) , 267-289
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10491949
Abstract
Sociologists have often criticised notions of preventive health work advocated by doctors. This work has yielded important insights into victim-blaming and into ways the economic and political causes of ill-health have been mystified or denied. While this analytical strategy remains an important one, it needs extending in at least three directions. First, we must appreciate changes over time in the forms of arguments about preventive work; secondly, we must situate the argument both in terms of developments within the medical profession and in terms of the relationship of the medical profession to the wider society; finally, we need to make sense of the doctors' claims that these ideas are radical/progressive. The paper is based on a recent series of reports on prevention by the Royal College of General Practitioners, and focusses in particular on the one dealing with preventive care for children.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Realities for change in child health care: existing patterns and future possibilities.BMJ, 1980
- ‘Prevention and Health: Every Mother's Business’, a Comment on Child Health Policies in the 1970sSociological Review, 1980
- The Politics of MotherhoodPublished by JSTOR ,1980
- The emancipation of biographical medicineSocial Science & Medicine. Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, 1979
- The Reorganisation of the National Health Service: Some Sociological Aspects with Special References to the Role of the Community PhysicianSociological Review, 1974