Global Descriptive Evaluations Are More Responsive than Global Numeric Ratings in Detecting Studentsʼ Progress during the Inpatient Portion of an Internal Medicine Clerkship
- 1 October 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Academic Medicine
- Vol. 76 (Supplement) , S105-S107
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200110001-00035
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using Formal Evaluation Sessions for Case-based Faculty Development during Clinical ClerkshipsAcademic Medicine, 2000
- Grade Inflation in Internal Medicine Clerkships: Results of a National SurveyTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 2000
- Assessing How Well Three Evaluation Methods Detect Deficiencies in Medical Studentsʼ Professionalism in Two Settings of an Internal Medicine ClerkshipAcademic Medicine, 2000
- Investing in descriptive evaluation: a vision for the future of assessmentMedical Teacher, 2000
- A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluationsAcademic Medicine, 1999
- Internship ratings as a validity outcome measure for an evaluation system to identify inadequate clerkship performanceAcademic Medicine, 1998
- The effectiveness of formal evaluation sessions during clinical clerkships in better identifying students with marginal funds of knowledgeAcademic Medicine, 1997