Improving Fairness in Coverage Decisions: Performance Expectations for Quality Improvement
- 1 August 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in American Journal of Bioethics
- Vol. 4 (3) , 87-100
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160490497678
Abstract
Patients and physicians often perceive the current health care system to be unfair, in part because of the ways in which coverage decisions appear to be made. To address this problem the Ethical Force Program, a collaborative effort to create quality improvement tools for ethics in health care, has developed five content areas specifying ethical criteria for fair health care benefits design and administration. Each content area includes concrete recommendations and measurable expectations for performance improvement, which can be used by those organizations involved in the design and administration of health benefits packages, such as purchasers, health plans, benefits consultants, and practitioner groups.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shared expectations for protection of identifiable health care informationJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2001
- Medical Professionalism in SocietyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- An intervention to increase patientsʼ trust in their physicians. Stanford Trust Study Physician GroupAcademic Medicine, 1999
- Patient-physician covenantPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Of Rescue and Responsibility: Learning to Live with LimitsJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1994
- The Journal's Policy on Cost-Effectiveness AnalysesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Unjustified use of the quality of well-being scale in priority setting in OregonHealth Policy, 1993
- Oregon's methods. Did cost-effectiveness analysis fail?JAMA, 1991
- Setting health care priorities in Oregon. Cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescuePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- What care is 'essential'? What services are 'basic'?JAMA, 1991