The General and Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Duloxetine in Major Depressive Disorder
- 1 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Drug Safety
- Vol. 32 (12) , 1159-1173
- https://doi.org/10.2165/11318930-000000000-00000
Abstract
Background: Second-generation antidepressants dominate the management of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Evidence on the general and comparative benefits and harms is still accruing. Objective: To systematically review the general and comparative efficacy and safety of duloxetine for the treatment of acute-phase MDD in adults. Data Sources: We conducted a search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsychLit, The Cochrane Library, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1980 to July 2009, as well as manually searching reference lists of pertinent review articles and exploring the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research database to identify unpublished research. Study Selection: For efficacy, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing duloxetine with placebo or second-generation antidepressants were included. For safety, both experimental and observational studies were eligible. Data Extraction: Abstracts and full-text articles were independently reviewed by two people, one investigator extracted relevant data, and a senior reviewer checked data for completeness and accuracy. Results: We included 36 experimental and observational studies and, where sufficient data were available, meta-analyses of RCTs were conducted. Findings indicated that duloxetine is an effective treatment option for acute-phase MDD, with a tolerability profile similar to other second-generation antidepressants. No substantial differences in efficacy and safety appear to exist when duloxetine is compared with other second-generation antidepressants. Overall, about 40% of patients treated with duloxetine achieved remission. Compared with other treatments, duloxetine had frequently higher rates of nausea, vomiting and dry mouth; however, these differences did not lead to higher discontinuation rates compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors as a class. There is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about rare but severe adverse events. Conclusions: Current evidence does not warrant the choice of duloxetine over other second-generation antidepressants based on greater efficacy or safety for patients with acute-phase MDD with or without accompanying symptoms such as pain.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Controlling for Drug Dose in Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: A Case Study of the Effect of Antidepressant DoseMedical Decision Making, 2009
- Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: A revision of the 2000 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelinesJournal of Psychopharmacology, 2008
- Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: A Meta-Analysis of Data Submitted to the Food and Drug AdministrationPLoS Medicine, 2008
- Safety and Tolerability of Duloxetine at 60 mg Once Daily in Elderly Patients With Major Depressive DisorderJournal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2008
- Evidence for the efficacy of duloxetine in treating mild, moderate, and severe depressionInternational Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2007
- Changes in Sexual Functioning Associated with Duloxetine, Escitalopram, and Placebo in the Treatment of Patients with Major Depressive DisorderThe Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2007
- The safety and tolerability of duloxetine in depressed elderly patients with and without medical comorbidityPublished by Hindawi Limited ,2007
- A comparative study of the efficacy of acute and continuation treatment with escitalopram versus duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorderCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2007
- Duloxetine 60 mg once daily in the treatment of milder major depressive disorderInternational Journal Of Clinical Practice, 2006
- Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey ReplicationArchives of General Psychiatry, 2005