Detection and characterization of primary liver cancer in rats by MS‐264‐enhanced MRI
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Vol. 35 (4) , 532-539
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910350412
Abstract
A new MR contrast agent, MS‐264 (Gd(1 RS)‐1‐(p‐butylbenzyl)‐DTPA), was developed to achieve hepatobiliary specificity and its potential evaluated for detecting and characterizing liver tumors in rats with chemically induced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In seven rats with 66 HCC lesions, enhancements of different abdominal organs and tumors were compared on T1‐weighted images after intravenous administration of Gd‐DTPA (0.3 mmol/kg) and MS‐264 (0.05 mmol/kg). MR images were correlated with postmortem microangiographic and histological findings. An overall enhancement of different organs, which normalized within 24 h, was observed after Gd‐DTPA and MS‐264 injection. MS‐264 caused a higher relative enhancement (RE) in liver (60%), compared with that of Gd‐DTPA (40%), which resulted in a prompt negative contrast enhancement in 59 of 66 HCCs. All were moderately to poorly differentiated (Grades II–IV) tumors. Six of these 59 negative contrast‐enhancing lesions showed a positively enhanced peritumoral rim, which corresponded histologically to malignant infiltration (n = 2) or compression (n = 4). On the other hand, six well differentiated HCCs showed prolonged positive enhancement. However, one well differentiated HCC was not positively enhanced by MS‐264, probably due to poor access of the agent to the lesion. In comparison to that of the pre‐contrast images, enhancement with Gd‐DTPA and MS‐264 increased the number of detected lesions by 22 and 42%, respectively. In this animal study, MS‐264 proved to be useful in detection and characterization of primary liver cancers.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- MR imaging of the liver: breath-hold T1-weighted MP-GRE compared with conventional T2-weighted SE imaging--lesion detection, localization, and characterization.Radiology, 1994
- Comparison between Gd-DTPA, Gd-EOB-DTPA, and Mn-DPDP in induced HCC in rats: A correlation study of MR imaging, microangiography, and histologyMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1993
- Liver Contrast Media for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interrelations between Pharmacokinetics and ImagingInvestigative Radiology, 1993
- Focal liver disease: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and T2-weighted fat-suppressed, FLASH, and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T.Radiology, 1992
- Detection of hepatic masses in patients with carcinoma: comparative sensitivities of sonography, CT, and MR imaging.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1991
- Dynamic CT vs 0.5 T MR Imaging in the Detection of Surgically Proven Hepatic MetastasesJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1989
- Leo J. Rigler lecture. MR imaging of the liverAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1986
- Surgery for Hepatic NeoplasmsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- THE INDUCTION OF LIVER CELL CANCER BY CHEMICALSPublished by Elsevier ,1976
- Primary carcinoma of the liver.A study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsiesCancer, 1954