Continuing Stability of Center Differences in Pediatric Diabetes Care: Do Advances in Diabetes Treatment Improve Outcome?
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 September 2007
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 30 (9) , 2245-2250
- https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-0475
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To reevaluate the persistence and stability of previously observed differences between pediatric diabetes centers and to investigate the influence of demography, language communication problems, and changes in insulin regimens on metabolic outcome, hypoglycemia, and ketoacidosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—This was an observational cross-sectional international study in 21 centers, with clinical data obtained from all participants and A1C levels assayed in one central laboratory. All individuals with diabetes aged 11–18 years (49.4% female), with duration of diabetes of at least 1 year, were invited to participate. Fourteen of the centers participated in previous Hvidoere Studies, allowing direct comparison of glycemic control across centers between 1998 and 2005. RESULTS—Mean A1C was 8.2 ± 1.4%, with substantial variation between centers (mean A1C range 7.4–9.2%; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between centers in rates of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis. Language difficulties had a significant negative impact on metabolic outcome (A1C 8.5 ± 2.0% vs. 8.2 ± 1.4% for those with language difficulties vs. those without, respectively; P < 0.05). After adjustement for significant confounders of age, sex, duration of diabetes, insulin regimen, insulin dose, BMI, and language difficulties, the center differences persisted, and the effect size for center was not reduced. Relative center ranking since 1998 has remained stable, with no significant change in A1C. CONCLUSIONS—Despite many changes in diabetes management, major differences in metabolic outcome between 21 international pediatric diabetes centers persist. Different application between centers in the implementation of insulin treatment appears to be of more importance and needs further exploration.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Current practice of insulin pump therapy in children and adolescents - the Hannover recipePediatric Diabetes, 2006
- Risk and benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) treatment in school children and adolescentsPediatric Diabetes, 2006
- Insulin pumps in pediatrics: We have the technology. We have the evidence. Why are still so few kids using it?Pediatric Diabetes, 2006
- Comparing and predicting between several methods of measurementBiostatistics, 2004
- Insulin injection regimens and metabolic control in an international survey of adolescents with type 1 diabetes over 3 years: results from the Hvidore study groupEuropean Journal of Pediatrics, 2003
- Training in flexible, intensive insulin management to enable dietary freedom in people with type 1 diabetes: dose adjustment for normal eating (DAFNE) randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2002
- Beneficial effects of intensive therapy of diabetes during adolescence: Outcomes after the conclusion of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)The Journal of Pediatrics, 2001
- Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. A new way to lower risk of severe hypoglycemia, improve metabolic control, and enhance coping in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.Diabetes Care, 1999
- Glycated Hemoglobin and Related Factors in Diabetic Children and Adolescents Under 18 Years of Age: a Belgian ExperienceDiabetes Care, 1997
- Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications TrialThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1994