Equal Opportunity or Equal Social Outcome?
- 1 April 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Economics and Philosophy
- Vol. 11 (1) , 25-55
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267100003217
Abstract
John Rawls's work (1971) has greatly contributed to rehabilitating equality as a basic social value, after decades of utilitarian hegemony,particularly in normative economics, but Rawls also emphasized that full equality of welfare is not an adequate goal either. This thesis was echoed in Dworkin's famous twin papers on equality (Dworkin 1981a,b), and it is now widely accepted that egalitarianism must be selective. The bulk of the debate on ‘Equality of What?’ thus deals with what variables ought to be submitted for selection and how this selection ought to be carried out.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Equality of What? On Welfare, Goods, and CapabilitiesPublished by Princeton University Press ,2011
- Equality and PartialityMichigan Law Review, 1993
- Privacy and Social FreedomPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1992
- Rights to Liberty in Purely Private MattersEconomics and Philosophy, 1989
- On the Currency of Egalitarian JusticeEthics, 1989
- Equality and equal opportunity for welfarePhilosophical Studies, 1989
- Commodities and CapabilitiesCanadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 1987
- Reasons and PersonsPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1986
- Equality of TalentEconomics and Philosophy, 1985
- Egalitarian Equivalent Allocations: A New Concept of Economic EquityThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1978