The Chicago Tradition and Social Change: Thomas, Park And Their Successors
- 1 March 1978
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Symbolic Interaction
- Vol. 1 (2) , 5-23
- https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1978.1.2.5
Abstract
Through their writings and research, Thomas and Park exemplified to their students and their successors at Chicago how to “do” sociololgy. Central to their respective positions were their conceptions of social change, reform and progress; the role of science and especially sociology; the agents of social change; the arenas and mechanisms of social change. Not only were there some basic differences in their respective conceptions, but succeeding generations of Chicago sociologists have been profoundly influenced in their ideas and work by selective interpretations of either or both founding fathers of this tradition. Like any other intellectual tradition, the Chicago one is neither as integrated as it often seems nor have its participants drawn on precisely the same aspects of their intellectual heritage. To understand the work of contemporary “Chicagoans,” it is necessary to, at least, understand what they have made and are making of their diverse heritage.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Life Histories of W. I. Thomas and Robert E. ParkAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1973
- Sociological Theory in Industrial RelationsAmerican Sociological Review, 1947
- News as a Form of Knowledge: A Chapter in the Sociology of KnowledgeAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1940
- The Prediction of Adjustment in MarriageAmerican Sociological Review, 1936
- Human EcologyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1936
- The Social Survey a Field for Constructive Service by Departments of SociologyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1916
- The Prussian-Polish Situation: An Experiment in AssimilationAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1914
- The Mind of Woman and the Lower RacesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1907
- The Psychology of Race-PrejudiceAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1904
- The Scope and Method of Folk-PsychologyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1896