Too Many to Fail? Evidence of Regulatory Forbearance When the Banking Sector Is Weak
Top Cited Papers
- 27 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 24 (4) , 1378-1405
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp039
Abstract
This article studies bank failures in twenty-one emerging market countries in the 1990s. By using a competing risk hazard model for bank survival, we show that a government is less likely to take over or close a failing bank if the banking system is weak. This Too-Many-to-Fail effect is robust to controlling for macroeconomic factors, financial crises, the Too-Big-to-Fail effect, domestic financial development, and concerns due to systemic risk and information spillovers. The article also shows that the Too-Many-to-Fail effect is stronger for larger banks and when there is a large government budget deficit.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Private credit in 129 countries☆Journal of Financial Economics, 2007
- Monitoring the Monitors: The Corporate Governance in Japanese Banks and Their Real Estate Lending in the 1980s*The Journal of Business, 2006
- Too many to fail—An analysis of time-inconsistency in bank closure policiesPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Crisis Resolution, Policies, and Institutions: Empirical EvidencePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2005
- On the Resolution of Banking Crises: Theory and EvidenceSSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- The Great Divide and Beyond: Financial Architecture in TransitionJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2002
- Comparing Market and Supervisory Assessments of Bank Performance: Who Knows What When?Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2000
- An analysis of contagion and competitive effects at commercial banksJournal of Financial Economics, 1999
- Unemployment Insurance Rules, Joblessness, and Part-Time WorkEconometrica, 1996
- An application of the cox proportional hazards model to bank failureJournal of Banking & Finance, 1986