How a General Population Perceives Its Sleep and How This Relates to the Complaint of Insomnia
Open Access
- 1 September 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Sleep
- Vol. 20 (9) , 715-723
- https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/20.9.715
Abstract
The traditional indicators of insomnia (i.e. difficulty initiating sleep, difficulty maintaining sleep, non-restorative sleep, early morning awakening) were assessed in a representative sample of 1,722 French-speaking Montrealers (Canada) aged 15 to 100 years. These subjects were interviewed over the telephone (81.3% of contacted sample) by means of the Sleep-Eval software. Subjects were classified as either satisfied or dissatisfied with quality of sleep (SQS or DQS), with or without insomnia indicators (+I or −I). Sociodemographics, sleep-wake schedules, evening activities, medication intake, recent medical consultations, and social life were also investigated. DQS subjects composed 17.8% of the population (DQS+I: 11.2%; DQS − I: 6.5%), and 21.7% of subjects were classified as either DQS+I or SQS+I. Overall, 3.8% of subjects reported using a sleep-enhancing medication. Nonrestorative sleep did not significantly distinguish SQS and DQS subjects. The complaint of nonrestorative sleep is not a useful indicator of insomnia, despite its inclusion in all medical classifications. DQS−I and SQS+I subjects defy traditional classifications. A better understanding of sleep complaints and more accurate classifications will help physicians identify patients with insomnia and meet their needs more appropriatelyKeywords
This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit:
- Pseudo(experiental)-insomnia and idiopathic(objective) insomnia: Theoretical and therapeutic issuesAdvances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1979