Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine–Prilocaine Cream for Pain during Circumcision
Open Access
- 24 April 1997
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 336 (17) , 1197-1201
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199704243361701
Abstract
Neonatal circumcision is a painful surgical procedure often performed without analgesia. We assessed the efficacy and safety of 5 percent lidocaine–prilocaine cream (Emla) in neonates undergoing circumcision. We carried out a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in 68 full-term male neonates: 38 were assigned to receive lidocaine–prilocaine cream, and 30 to receive placebo. One gram of lidocaine–prilocaine or placebo cream was applied to the penis under an occlusive dressing for 60 to 80 minutes before circumcision. Behavioral (facial activity and time spent crying) and physiologic (heart rate and blood pressure) responses were recorded during the procedure. Blood samples were obtained at various times after drug application for measurements of methemoglobin and plasma lidocaine, prilocaine, and o -toluidine (a metabolite of prilocaine). A total of 68 and 59 neonates were included in the safety and efficacy analyses, respectively. Demographic characteristics such as gestational age and birth weight did not differ between the lidocaine–prilocaine and placebo groups. During circumcision, the neonates in the lidocaine–prilocaine group had less facial activity (P = 0.01), spent less time crying (P<0.001), and had smaller increases in heart rate (P = 0.007) than the neonates in the placebo group. Facial-activity scores were 12 to 49 percent lower during various steps of the procedure in the lidocaine–prilocaine group. As compared with neonates in the placebo group, infants in the lidocaine–prilocaine group cried less than half as much and had heart-rate increases of 10 beats per minute less. Blood methemoglobin concentrations (expressed as a percentage of the hemoglobin concentration) were similar (1.3 percent) in both groups. Lidocaine and prilocaine were detected in plasma in 23 (61 percent) and 21 (55 percent) of the infants treated with lidocaine–prilocaine cream, respectively. Lidocaine–prilocaine cream is efficacious and safe for the prevention of pain from circumcision in neonates.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement of Methemoglobin after EMLA® Analgesia for Newborn CircumcisionNeonatology, 1996
- Utilisation de la creme EMLA® chez la nouveau-né à terme et prématuré. Étude d'efficacité et de toléranceArchives de Pédiatrie, 1995
- Anesthésie locale par crème ⪡EMLA⪢ et risque de méthémoglobinémie chez le prématuréArchives de Pédiatrie, 1995
- Use of lidocaine-prilocaine cream for vaccination pain in infantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1994
- Topical anesthesia during circumcision in newborn infantsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- Assessing pain and analgesia with a lidocaine-prilocaine emulsion in infants and toddlers during venipunctureThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- Neonatal facial and cry responses to invasive and non-invasive proceduresPain, 1990
- Judgment of pain in newborns: Facial activity and cry as determinants.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 1988
- Local anesthesia for neonatal circumcision. Effects on distress and cortisol responseJAMA, 1988
- Regional Anesthesia During Newborn CircumcisionClinical Pediatrics, 1983