Elective hepatic resection in the elderly

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This retrospective review assessed the safety and validity of elective liver resection in patients older than 64 years of age. In all, 293 patients underwent elective liver resection over a 23-year period (1967–1990). Fifty-two patients (18 per cent) were older than 64 (maximum 84, mean 70.4) years and all but four of these did not have cirrhosis. In this older subgroup, indications for resection were liver metastases in 30 patients, primary malignancy in 16, benign tumours in five and multiple abscesses in one. There were 21 major resections, with two deaths from hepatic failure, and 31 minor resections, with one death from cardiac failure (total mortality rate 6 per cent). During the same period, there were seven deaths after elective resections performed in 222 patients without cirrhosis who were younger than 64 years (P = 0.39). Mortality rate and duration of postoperative hospital stay were not related to the extent of liver resection nor to patients' grading according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists' criteria. Intraoperative blood loss was the only parameter found to influence mortality rate (P = 0.008) and duration of hospital stay (P = 0.04). Elective liver resection can be safely undertaken in elderly patients without cirrhosis, provided that intraoperative blood loss is minimized.

This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit: