Response to ‘‘Comment on a proposed method for finding barrier height distributions’’ [J. Chem. Phys. 103, 1235 (1995)]
- 15 July 1995
- journal article
- Published by AIP Publishing in The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Vol. 103 (3) , 1237-1238
- https://doi.org/10.1063/1.469785
Abstract
A rebuttal is given to a criticism of an approximate method for the determination of the distribution of energy barrier heights in liquids and proteins. It is argued that the one-dimensional counterexample used in the critique violates clearly stated assumptions in the derivation, which also appear to hold in nature. The method is shown to be accurate in a more appropriate one-dimensional test.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comment on a proposed method for finding barrier height distributionsThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1995
- Extracting the Energy Barrier Distribution of a Disordered System from the Instantaneous Normal Mode Density of States: Applications to Peptides and ProteinsThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1994
- Dynamics in Rugged Energy Landscapes with Applications to the S-Peptide and Ribonuclease AJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1994
- Unstable modes in liquids density of states, potential energy, and heat capacityThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1993
- The Energy Landscapes and Motions of ProteinsScience, 1991
- Conformational Substates in ProteinsAnnual Review of Biophysics, 1988
- Multiple Conformational States of Proteins: A Molecular Dynamics Analysis of MyoglobinScience, 1987
- Packing Structures and Transitions in Liquids and SolidsScience, 1984
- Dynamics of structural transitions in liquidsPhysical Review A, 1983
- Hidden structure in liquidsPhysical Review A, 1982