Retrospective analysis of non-correlating cervical smears and colposcopically directed biopsies
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Diagnostic Cytopathology
- Vol. 11 (4) , 343-347
- https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.2840110406
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reliability of colposcopy and directed punch biopsyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990
- Comparison of repeat smear, colposcopy, and colposcopically directed biopsy in the evaluation of the mildly abnormal smearGynecologic Oncology, 1989
- An explanation for the problem of false‐negative cervical smearsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- Observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.BMJ, 1989
- Observer variability in histopathological reporting of cervical biopsy specimens.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1989
- Diagnostic Conization of the CervixObstetrics & Gynecology, 1986
- False-Negative Cytology in Invasive Cancer of the CervixClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1983
- THE ACCURACY OF COLPOSCOPICALLY DIRECTED BIOPSY IN PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA OF THE CERVIXBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1980
- Observer variation and quality control of cytodiagnosisJournal of Clinical Pathology, 1974
- Effects of observer variation in population screening for cervical carcinomaJournal of Clinical Pathology, 1973