RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED TRIAL OF THE ONCE DAILY ANTIMUSCARINIC AGENT SOLIFENACIN SUCCINATE IN PATIENTS WITH OVERACTIVE BLADDER
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 172 (5) , 1919-1924
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000140729.07840.16
Abstract
Purpose: In this phase 3 trial we assessed the efficacy of solifenacin 5 mg and 10 mg daily in patients with symptoms related to overactive bladder. In addition, we assessed the safety and acceptability of solifenacin. Materials and Methods: The study was a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Patients were randomized to 12-week once daily treatment with solifenacin 5 mg, solifenacin 10 mg or placebo. The primary efficacy variable was changed from baseline to study end point in mean number of micturitions per 24 hours. Secondary efficacy variables included changes from baseline in mean number of urgency, nocturia and incontinence episodes per 24 hours, and mean volume voided per micturition. Results: Compared with changes obtained with placebo (−1.59), micturitions per 24 hours were statistically significantly decreased with solifenacin 5 mg (−2.37, p = 0.0018) and solifenacin 10 mg (−2.81, p = 0.0001). A statistically significant decrease was observed in the number of incontinence episodes with both solifenacin doses (5 mg, p = 0.002 and 10 mg, p = 0.016). This effect was also seen for episodes of urge incontinence (5 mg, p = 0.014 and 10 mg, p = 0.042). Of patients reporting incontinence at baseline, fully 50% achieved continence after treatment with solifenacin. Episodes of nocturia were statistically significantly decreased in patients treated with solifenacin 10 mg (−0.71, −38.5%) versus placebo (−0.52, −16.4%, p = 0.036). Episodes of urgency were statistically significantly reduced with solifenacin 5 mg (−2.84, −51%, p = 0.003) and solifenacin 10 mg (−2.90, −52%, p = 0.002). Mean volume voided per micturition was statistically significantly increased with both solifenacin doses (p = 0.0001). Treatment with solifenacin was well tolerated. Dry mouth, mostly mild in severity, was reported in 7.7% of patients receiving solifenacin 5 mg and 23% receiving solifenacin 10 mg (vs 2.3% with placebo). Conclusions: In this study treatment with solifenacin 5 mg and 10 mg once daily significantly improved all the major symptoms of overactive bladder including frequency, urgency and incontinence. Solifenacin 10 mg also decreased the frequency of nocturia. Solifenacin therapy was associated with a favorable tolerability profile and a low incidence of dry mouth, especially at the 5 mg starting dose.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized, double‐blind placebo‐ and tolterodine‐controlled trial of the once‐daily antimuscarinic agent solifenacin in patients with symptomatic overactive bladderBJU International, 2004
- Estimated economic costs of overactive bladder in the United StatesUrology, 2003
- Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Efficacy and Tolerability of the Extended-Release Formulations of Oxybutynin and Tolterodine for Overactive Bladder: Results of the OPERA TrialMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2003
- The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence SocietyPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Current pharmacotherapeutic strategies for overactive bladderExpert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 2002
- How widespread are the symptoms of an overactive bladder and how are they managed? A population‐based prevalence studyBJU International, 2001
- Urinary Incontinence: Does it Increase Risk for Falls and Fractures?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2000
- Muscarinic receptor antagonists in the treatment of overactive bladderUrology, 2000
- The patient with an overactive bladder—Symptoms and quality-of-life issuesUrology, 1997
- Nocturia: A Risk Factor for Falls in the ElderlyJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1992