Why do male antler flies (Protopiophila litigata) fight? The role of male combat in the structure of mating aggregations on moose antlers
- 1 July 1999
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ethology Ecology & Evolution
- Vol. 11 (3) , 287-301
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1999.9522829
Abstract
The antler fly Protopiophila litigata Bonduriansky (Diptera Piophilidae) forms large mating/oviposition aggregations on discarded moose (Alces alces) antlers, where the strikingly aggressive males engage in frequent combat. According to theory, costly fighting behaviour will be maintained by selection only if winners sire more progeny than losers. Through a field study of individu- ally marked flies, we addressed the question "Why do male antler flies fight?" by investigating what resources males compete for on antlers, whether or not large male body size and resulting advantage in agonistic encounters confers position- al advantage in the mating aggregation, and whether the successful males expe- rience greater survivorship or greater mating frequency. As expected, most ago- nistic contests were won by the larger male. Large males tended to live longer, mate more frequently, and achieve more matings over their lifetimes than small males. Males fought and defended territories primarily on the upward-facing ('upper') surfaces of antlers. The main oviposition site attracted the highest den- sity of single males, and mean body size of single males was largest in this region. Males mate-searching near the main oviposition site achieved the highest mean lifetime mating success on the upper surface. Multiple regression analysis indicated that the main oviposition site was the only region where mate- searching tended to increase male mating frequency and, on average, males mated nearly twice as frequently when mate-searching there as they did when mate-searching elsewhere. These results suggest that male antler flies fight for opportunities to search for females in areas where they will mate more frequent- ly and thus achieve more matings over their lifetimes.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Male antler flies (Protopiophila litigata; Diptera: Piophilidae) are more selective than females in mate choiceCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1998
- A TECHNIQUE FOR MEASURING AND MARKING LIVE FLIESThe Canadian Entomologist, 1997
- A NEW NEARCTIC SPECIES OF PROTOPIOPHILA DUDA (DIPTERA: PIOPHILIDAE), WITH NOTES ON ITS BEHAVIOUR AND COMPARISON WITH P. LATIPES (MEIGEN)The Canadian Entomologist, 1995
- The effects of male body size on territorial and mating success in the landmark-defending fly Hermetia comstocki (Stratiomyidae)Ecological Entomology, 1993
- Sexual competition among females: What causes courtship-role reversal?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1991
- Population Structure and Mating System of a Desert Bee Fly (Lordotus Pulchrissimus; Diptera: Bombyliidae). 2. Female Demography, Copulations and Characteristics of Swarm SitesOikos, 1989
- Population Structure and Mating System of a Desert Bee Fly (Lordotus Pulchrissimus; Diptera: Bombyliidae). 1. Male Demography and InteractionsOikos, 1989
- Leks and hilltopping in insectsJournal of Natural History, 1987
- Sexual Selection and Variance in Reproductive SuccessThe American Naturalist, 1979
- Ecology, Sexual Selection, and the Evolution of Mating SystemsScience, 1977