Intraguild predation among ladybeetles and a green lacewing: do the larval spines of Curinus coeruleus(Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) serve a defensive function?
- 1 December 2003
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Bulletin of Entomological Research
- Vol. 93 (6) , 499-505
- https://doi.org/10.1079/ber2003269
Abstract
Laboratory experiments examined interspecific interactions between larvae of three coccinellid species, Curinus coeruleus Mulsant (Chilocorinae), Harmonia axyridis Pallas and Olla v-nigrum (Mulsant) (Coccinellinae), and between these and larvae of the green lacewing, Chrysoperla rufilabris (Burmeister). Larvae of C. coeruleus, although defended on their dorsal surface with long spines, had the smallest mandibles, were the slowest-moving, and the least successful in interspecific larval combat. The long spines of third instar C. coeruleusappeared to reduce their palatability as food to H. axyridis and O. v-nigrum larvae in choice tests with dead larvae, but were not an effective defence against these species in Petri dish arenas. Larvae of O. v-nigrum had a smooth dorsal surface, were intermediate in terms of mandible size, but were the fastest moving, a trait that benefited their survival in intraguild combat. Larvae of H. axyridis were intermediate with respect to dorsal spines and speed of movement, but had the largest mandibles. This species was the most effective intraguild combatant among the coccinellids and the only one to successfully compete against C. rufilabris larvae of similar age. The speed, manoeuverability and long mandibles of C. rufilabris enabled them to impale coccinellid larvae at a relatively safe distance. The spines of C. coeruleus larvae impeded laterally oriented attacks by C. rufilabris, but did not provide sustained protection from repeated attacks. Success in these interactions appeared largely a function of offensive weaponry (mandible size and morphology) and speed of movement, although the role of dorsal spines as defensive structures was not ruled out. Rates of larval cannibalism were highest for C. rufilabris and largely mirrored the level of aggression observed in interspecific combat for each species.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- 10.1023/A:1003426815471Published by Test accounts ,2011
- A comparative study of larval cannibalism in three species of ladybirdEcological Entomology, 2003
- Invasion of the Florida Citrus Ecosystem byHarmonia axyridis(Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Asymmetric Competition with a Native Species,Cycloneda sanguineaEnvironmental Entomology, 2002
- Evaluation of green lacewings, Chrysoperla plorabunda (Fitch) (Neurop., Chrysopidae), for augmentative release against Toxoptera citricida (Hom., Aphididae) in citrusJournal of Applied Entomology, 2001
- Potential for intraguild predation and competition among predatory Coccinellidae and ChrysopidaeEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1998
- Wax covers in larvae of two Scymnus species: do they enhance coccinellid larval survival?Oecologia, 1996
- Ecology of CoccinellidaePublished by Springer Nature ,1996
- Interrelationship between an entomogenous fungus and two ant-homopteran (Hymenoptera: Formicidae-Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae & Aphididae) mutualisms on guava treesBulletin of Entomological Research, 1983
- Is larval cannibalism in lacewings adaptive? (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)Population Ecology, 1981
- Wax production by coccinellid larvae (Coleoptera)Systematic Entomology, 1979