Evaluating Continuing Education
- 1 June 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation & the Health Professions
- Vol. 3 (2) , 171-190
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016327878000300204
Abstract
This article presents the evaluation meth odology used in an NIMHfunded continuing education project for mental health professionals. The 96 participants who completed the course in three distinct cy cles came both as work teams from agen cies and as individuals and had protential impact on 1700 staff and 6913 clients. Forty-eight quantifiable and two qualitative dependent measures were used to assess participants' perceptions of the course, knowledge and attitudes, clinical behaviors as reflected in work environment and ward atmosphere, and impact on client status. A controlled experimental design with pre- test, posttest, andfollow-up data collection points was planned. Problems encountered and evaluation findings suggest the need for different types of evaluation strategies.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Case Against Statistical Significance TestingHarvard Educational Review, 1978
- Evaluation Criteria in Studies of Continuing Education in the Health Professions : A Critical Review and a Suggested StrategyEvaluation & the Health Professions, 1978
- Secondary Analysis: An Important Resource for Educational Research and EvaluationEducational Researcher, 1978
- Meta Evaluation : An OverviewEvaluation & the Health Professions, 1978
- Constructivist Approaches in Educational ResearchReview of Educational Research, 1977
- A behavioral study of staff attitudes toward mental illness.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1965
- Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable1Journal of Personality, 1962