Factors affecting choice of distribution for flood series
Open Access
- 1 March 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Hydrological Sciences Journal
- Vol. 30 (1) , 25-36
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668509490969
Abstract
Rival candidate distributions for modelling flood series may give markedly different magnitude-return period (Q-T) relationships, particularly at high T, A priori theoretical arguments, empirical criteria for distribution choice and previously used methods of discrimination between candidate distributions are discussed. The effects which method of parameter estimation, treatment of outliers, inclusion of large historical flood values, data transformations and causal composition of the flood population may have on choice of distribution are also considered.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Log Pearson type-3 distribution: Parameter estimationJournal of Hydrology, 1983
- Flood frequency analysis with historic informationJournal of Hydrology, 1982
- Log Pearson III distribution — Is it applicable to flood frequency analysis of Australian streams?Journal of Hydrology, 1981
- Probability weighted moments compared with some traditional techniques in estimating Gumbel Parameters and quantilesWater Resources Research, 1979
- Probability weighted moments: Definition and relation to parameters of several distributions expressable in inverse formWater Resources Research, 1979
- Apparent regional skewWater Resources Research, 1977
- The Log Pearson type 3 distribution and its application in hydrologyWater Resources Research, 1975
- Just a moment!Water Resources Research, 1974
- Algebraic boundedness of sample statisticsWater Resources Research, 1974
- LEAST-SQUARES ESTIMATION OF LOCATION AND SCALE PARAMETERS USING ORDER STATISTICSBiometrika, 1952