Applicator exposure to 2,4‐D, dicamba, and a dicamba isomer
- 31 December 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B
- Vol. 17 (4) , 321-339
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03601238209372324
Abstract
Potential respiratory and dermal exposure to applicators were estimated in a ground boom spray application of 2,4‐D and dicamba. Time‐weighted averages for airborne herbicide residues did not exceed 2.2 ug/cu.m. in the cabs of application vehicles allowing only minor respiratory exposure. Dermal exposure was important as relatively large amounts of 2,4‐D (1.2–18 mg) and dicamba (0.32–6.6 mg) were rinsed from applicators’ hands. Urine analysis showed that the maximum elimination of herbicides occurred between 16 and 40 h after terminating exposure. A dicamba isomer (20% of the active material in the commercial formulation) was excreted in higher concentrations than dicamba in applicators’ urine suggesting different toxicokinetic properties for the two compounds.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- A mathematical model of creatine metabolism in normal males—comparison between theory and experimentThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1980
- Regional Variation in Percutaneous Penetration in ManArchives of environmental health, 1971
- A Method for Determination of Low Levels of Exposure to 2,4-D and 2,4,5-TInternational Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 1971
- Metabolism of C14-Labeled 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid in RatsJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1966
- Animal Metabolism of Herbicides, Fate of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid in SheepJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1964