Late toxicity following curative treatment of testicular cancer
- 7 December 1999
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Seminars in Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 17 (4) , 275-281
- https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2388(199912)17:4<275::aid-ssu9>3.0.co;2-u
Abstract
Cisplatin appears to be the major cause for long‐term toxicity in patients treated for testicular cancer. Long‐term side effects consist mainly of nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and neurotoxicity as well as gonadal damage. Following standard‐dose chemotherapy approximately 20% to 30% of patients will be affected by long‐term side effects, although not all these side effects will cause an impaired quality of life. Several strategies have been or currently are being evaluated to reduce acute and long‐term complications including the introduction of equally effective, but less toxic regimens, or the use of cytoprotective agents such as amifostine. Secondary acute myeloid leukemia and secondary myelodysplastic syndrome probably represent the worst possible long‐term complications of cancer therapy in those patients who originally were cured of their primary testicular cancer. Therapy‐related solid tumors are mainly associated with the use of radiation therapy and the risk for developing a therapy‐related solid tumor is increased approximately two to three times compared to the general population. In contrast, therapy‐related leukemias are predominantly associated with chemotherapy, particularly with the use of topoisomerase‐II inhibitors and alkylating agents. In general, the cumulative incidence of therapy‐related leukemia following treatment of germ cell cancer is low. It is approximately 0.5% and 2% at 5 years of median follow‐up for patients receiving etoposide at cumulative doses≤2 g/m2 and >2 g/m2, respectively. The risk‐benefit analysis in patients with testicular cancer clearly favors the use of current treatment regimens including high‐dose chemotherapy. However, even the acceptably low number of therapy‐related long‐term complications should encourage the search for equally effective but less toxic therapies. This review will highlight important available data about therapy‐related toxicity and particularly, therapy‐related malignancies following cisplatin‐etoposide‐based chemotherapy. Semin. Surg. Oncol. 17:275–281, 1999.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Amifostine pretreatment for protection against cyclophosphamide-induced and cisplatin-induced toxicities: results of a randomized control trial in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1996
- Long-term sequelae of treatment for testicular germ cell tumoursBritish Journal of Cancer, 1990
- Complications of Therapy for Testicular CancerJournal of Urology, 1989
- The late effects of cis-platinum on renal functionEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1989
- Effects of cisplatin on different measures of glomerular function in the human kidney with special emphasis on high-doseCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1988
- Creatinine clearance as a predictor of ultrafilterable platinum disposition in cancer patients treated with cisplatin: relationship between peak ultrafilterable platinum plasma levels and nephrotoxicity.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1987
- The long-term effect of cisplatin on renal functionCancer, 1986
- Acute and long-term nephrotoxicity of cis-platinum in manCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1986
- Cisplatin neuropathy. Clinical, electrophysiologic, morphologic, and toxicologic studiesCancer, 1984
- The renal pathology in clinical trials of Cis-platinum (II) diamminedichlorideCancer, 1977