Psychoanalysis, Science and Clinical Practice
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 26 (1) , 98-106
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00048679209068314
Abstract
The question of the relationship between psychoanalysis and science, and the place of psychoanalysis in clinical practice is reviewed. A commonly held view that the central question is whether or not psychoanalysis is scientific is challenged. It is argued instead that psychoanalysis, science and clinical practice are epistemologically independent fields and attempts to subsume one within the other are unproductive. Psychoanalysis may have as much to say concerning the epistemological basis of science as science has to say concerning the epistemological basis of psychoanalysis. Only a proper appreciation of this enables the question of the relationship between psychoanalysis and clinical practice to be adequately examined.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychoanalysis: A Creed in DeclineAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1989
- Psychoanalysis and Scientific Methods: No Need for DespondencyAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1988
- Psychoanalysis TodayAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1988
- What is "truth"? Some philosophical contributions to psychiatric issuesAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1988
- Science and PsychoanalysisAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1987
- Family Management in the Prevention of Exacerbations of SchizophreniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982