Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with isotonic dimeric (iodixanol) and monomeric (iohexol) nonionic contrast media: radiographic, clinical and neurophysiological evaluation
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in Neuroradiology
- Vol. 37 (1) , 48-50
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00588519
Abstract
Monomeric (iohexol 300 mg I/ml) and dimeric (iodixanol 270 mg I/ml) nonionic contrast media were compared in a double-blind, randomised, parallel group trial. Safety and efficacy of the media in intra-arterial cerebral digital subtraction angiography were evaluated by assessing adverse events, discomfort, EEG, heart rate and quality of radiodiagnostic information. Seventy-six patients underwent selective injection of the carotid and/or vertebral arteries. Both contrast media were well tolerated. No serious adverse events occurred. No effects on heart rate and EEG were evident. The arteriograms were of high quality and overall diagnostic information was optimal in 94% of the examinations. No clinically important differences between the two contrast media were found.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Iodixanol in femoral arteriography (phase III): A comparative double-blind parallel trial between iodixanol and iopromideClinical Radiology, 1993
- Iodixanol in cardioangiography in patients with coronary artery disease. Tolerability, cardiac and renal effects.1993
- Iodixanol in Cardioangiography in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseActa Radiologica, 1993
- ECG changes during cerebral angiography; a comparison of low osmolality contrast mediaEuropean Journal of Radiology, 1991
- Iohexol compared to meglumine-Ca-metrizoate in common carotid angiographyNeuroradiology, 1983
- Cerebral angiography with non-ionic (metrizamide) and ionic (meglumine metrizoate) watersoluble contrast mediaNeuroradiology, 1977
- Eeg, Ecg and other Recordings in Cerebral AngiographyActa Radiologica. Diagnosis, 1974