Reply to “Comment on ‘Why quantum mechanics cannot be formulated as a Markov process’ ”
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 56 (4) , 3304-3306
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.56.3304
Abstract
It is argued that the stochastic model of a quantum-mechanical two-state oscillator discussed in the preceding Comment by Hardy et al. [Phys. Rev. A 56, 3301 (1997)] does not constitute a valid classical stochastic process.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comment on “Why quantum mechanics cannot be formulated as a Markov process”Physical Review A, 1997
- The multivariate Langevin and Fokker–Planck equationsAmerican Journal of Physics, 1996
- Why quantum mechanics cannot be formulated as a Markov processPhysical Review A, 1994
- Realism and the quantum-mechanical two-state oscillatorPhysical Review A, 1992