Lower bounds on phase sensitivity in ideal and feasible measurements
- 1 April 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 49 (4) , 3022-3036
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.49.3022
Abstract
The detection of the phase shift between a single mode of the em field and a local reference oscillator is analyzed in the proper framework of quantum estimation theory. Such a fully quantum treatment clarifies the meaning of the ‘‘operational approach’’ suggested by Noh, Fougéres, and Mandel [Phys. Rev. A 45, 424 (1992)], in which different measurement schemes correspond to different phase operators. We show that the phase shift is actually measured in the form of the polar angle between two real output photocurrents, namely through a joint measurement of two conjugated quadratures of the field. This scheme is the only feasible one for detecting the quantum phase, and it is equivalently performed by either heterodyne detection or double-homodyne detection of the field. On the contrary, the customary homodyne detection (and, generally, any kind of measurement of a single phase-dependent variable) is more properly a zero-point phase measurement. As a definition of sensitivity we consider the output rms noise of the detection scheme, the only relevant one for actual experiments, in contrast with many other different notions currently adopted in the literature. We show that the rms phase sensitivity versus the average photon number n¯ is bounded by the ideal limit Δφ∼n, whereas for the feasible schemes the bound is Δφ∼n, in between the shot-noise level Δφ∼n and the ideal bound.
Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase properties of quantum states of lightPhysical Review A, 1992
- Phase measurement in quantum opticsQuantum Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B, 1992
- Realistic quantum states of light with minimum phase uncertaintyQuantum Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B, 1991
- Quantum phase detection and digital communicationQuantum Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B, 1991
- Quantum phase measurement: A system-theory perspectivePhysical Review A, 1991
- Phase optimized quantum states of lightOptics Communications, 1990
- Ultimate quantum limits on phase measurementPhysical Review Letters, 1989
- SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometersPhysical Review A, 1986
- Degenerate four-wave mixing as a possible source of squeezed-state lightPhysical Review A, 1984
- Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometerPhysical Review D, 1981