Democracy and the New Constitutionalism in Israel
Open Access
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Israel Law Review
- Vol. 33 (2) , 259-321
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021223700015995
Abstract
In a recent paper, I argue that the “new constitutionalism” — the transformation in the relations between courts and representative institutions that has swept the world and that is now sweeping Israel too — can best be understood as one of those “changes of everything so that everything would remain the same”. The promotion of courts and the demotion of legislatures through the judicial enforcement of “rigid” Charters and Bills of Rights has “legalized politics,” changing its nature as well as its locus. Contrary to those who regard this as an essentially democratic development, I argue that it is, to paraphrase Reuben Hasson, a weapon in the hands of democracy's enemies. I argue that the new constitutionalism was intended to operate and does operate as anantidoteto democracy, that it was meant to preserve the oligarchy of private property from the mortal danger posed by representative institutions elected by people without property, the original Greek “demos” from whence the term.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Brief History of the New Constitutionalism, or “How We Changed Everything So That Everything Would Remain the Same”Israel Law Review, 1998
- Israel's 'Constitutional Revolution': The Legal Interpretation of Entrenched Civil Liberties in an Emerging Neo-Liberal Economic OrderThe American Journal of Comparative Law, 1998
- The supreme court of Israel: Formative years, 1948–1955Studies in Zionism, 1990
- “Landmark Cases” and the Reproduction of Legitimacy: The Case of Israel's High Court of JusticeLaw & Society Review, 1990
- The Defence of the State and the Democratic Regime in the Supreme CourtIsrael Law Review, 1985