Cytotoxicity of Absorption Enhancers in Caco-2 Cell Monolayers
Open Access
- 1 October 1998
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
- Vol. 50 (10) , 1101-1108
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1998.tb03319.x
Abstract
This study was performed to evaluate the utility of absorption enhancers with reference to mucosal cell cytotoxicity. Overall assessment of the damage to plasma, lysosomal and nuclear membranes by three absorption enhancers, sodium deoxycholate, sodium caprate and dipotassium glycyrrhizinate, was performed on Caco-2 cell monolayers. The cytotoxicities of sodium deoxycholate (0.02–0.1% w/v), sodium caprate (0.1–0.5% w/v) and dipotassium glycyrrhizinate (0.5–2% w/v) were evaluated by the trypan blue-exclusion test, the protein-release test, the neutral-red assay, the DNA-propidium iodide staining test and the test for recovery of transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) up to 24 h after treatment with each enhancer. Sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS; 0.1% w/v), a potent surfactant, was used as positive control. SDS at this level was significantly cytotoxic whereas dipotassium glycyrrhizinate was not cytotoxic in any tests. Results from the trypan blue-exclusion and protein-release tests showed that high concentrations of sodium caprate (0.5% w/v) and sodium deoxycholate (0.1% w/v) were significantly cytotoxic to the plasma membrane. The neutral-red assay, an indicator of damage to lysosomal membranes, revealed that 0.5% (w/v) sodium caprate had no effect whereas the uptake of neutral red was slightly increased by treatment with 0.1% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, implying that the compound had cell-growth-enhancing activity. Nuclear-membrane damage, as evaluated by the DNA-propidium iodide staining test, was severe in cell monolayers treated with 0.5% (w/v) sodium caprate compared with that induced by 0.1% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate. In the TEER recovery test, TEER failed to recover 24 h after treatment with 0.5% (w/v) sodium caprate and 0.1% (w/v) SDS, but recovered after treatment with 0.1% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate. The recovery of TEER might be related to nuclear membrane damage and cell-growth-enhancing activity. These results indicate that of the three classes of enhancer, dipotassium glycyrrhizinate was not cytotoxic and that high concentrations of sodium caprate and sodium deoxycholate could damage plasma and nuclear membranes.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pharmacotoxicological applications of an equivalent dermis: three measurements of cytotoxicityCell Biology and Toxicology, 1995
- In vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity of diepoxy compounds used for biomaterial modificationJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1995
- Sodium Caprate Elicits Dilatations in Human Intestinal Tight Junctions and Enhances Drug Absorption by the Paracellular RoutePharmaceutical Research, 1993
- Correlation between oral drug absorption in humans and apparent drug permeability coefficients in human intestinal epithelial (Caco-2) cellsBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1991
- Characterization of the Human Colon Carcinoma Cell Line (Caco-2) as a Model System for Intestinal Epithelial PermeabilityGastroenterology, 1989
- Promotion of nasal absorption of insulin by glycyrrhetinic acid derivatives. I.Journal of Pharmacobio-Dynamics, 1989
- Effect of Bile Salts on Nasal Permeability In VitroJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1987
- Sodium deoxycholate promotes the absorption of heparin administered orally, probably by acting on gastrointestinal mucosa, in ratsCellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 1985
- Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorptionToxicology Letters, 1985
- Rapid flow cytofluorometric analysis of mammalian cell cycle by propidium iodide staining.The Journal of cell biology, 1975