Phase I Study of Sequential Vaccinations With Fowlpox-CEA(6D)-TRICOM Alone and Sequentially With Vaccinia-CEA(6D)-TRICOM, With and Without Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, in Patients With Carcinoembryonic Antigen–Expressing Carcinomas
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 23 (4) , 720-731
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.10.206
Abstract
Purpose Our previous clinical experience with vaccinia and replication-defective avipox recombinant carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) vaccines has demonstrated safety and clinical activity with a correlation between CEA-specific immune response and survival. Preclinical evidence demonstrated that the addition of the transgenes for three T-cell costimulatory molecules (B7-1, ICAM-1, LFA-3, designated TRICOM) results in a significant improvement in antigen-specific T-cell responses and antitumor activity. We describe here the first trial in humans of the CEA-TRICOM vaccines (also including an enhancer agonist epitope within the CEA gene). Patients and Methods Fifty-eight patients with advanced CEA-expressing cancers were accrued to eight cohorts that involved vaccinations with the following: replication-defective fowlpox recombinant (rF)-CEA(6D)-TRICOM; primary vaccination with recombinant vaccinia (rV)-CEA(6D)-TRICOM plus rF-CEA(6D)-TRICOM booster vaccinations; and rV-CEA(6D)-TRICOM and then rF-CEA(6D)-TRICOM, plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) with vaccines, or with divided doses of vaccine with GM-CSF. Vaccines were administered every 28 days for six doses and then once every 3 months. Reverting to treatments every 28 days was allowed if patients progressed on the 3-month schedule. Results In this phase I study, no significant toxicity was observed. Twenty-three patients (40%) had stable disease for at least 4 months, with 14 of these patients having prolonged stable disease (> 6 months). Eleven patients had decreasing or stable serum CEA, and one patient had a pathologic complete response. Enhanced CEA-specific T-cell responses were observed in the majority of patients tested. Conclusion We demonstrated that the CEA-TRICOM vaccines are safe and can generate significant CEA-specific immune responses, and they seem to have clinical benefit in some patients with advanced cancer.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Durable Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA)-Specific Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses in Colorectal Carcinoma Patients Vaccinated with Recombinant CEA and Granulocyte/Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorClinical Cancer Research, 2004
- Differences in T‐cell immunity toward tumor‐associated antigens in colorectal cancer and breast cancer patientsInternational Journal of Cancer, 2003
- General Keynote: Vaccine Strategies for the Therapy of Ovarian CancerGynecologic Oncology, 2003
- Vaccines for colon cancerPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2000
- PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN ONLY PROGRESSION OF PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2000
- Quantitative analysis of CEA expression in colorectal adenocarcinoma and serum: Lack of correlationInternational Journal of Cancer, 1997
- Vaccination with syngeneic, lymphoma-derived immunoglobulin idiotype combined with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor primes mice for a protective T-cell response.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1996
- Results of a phase I trial of a recombinant vaccinia virus that expresses carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with advanced colorectal cancerAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 1996
- Biological and immunogenic properties of a canarypox-rabies recombinant, ALVAC-RG (vCP65) in non-avian speciesVaccine, 1995
- Carcinoembryonic antigen gene family: Molecular biology and clinical perspectivesJournal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 1991