Simulation of Mechanisms of Viral Interference in Influenza
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 19 (2) , 444-454
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/19.2.444
Abstract
Ackerman E (Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Health Computer Sciences, University of Minnesota, Box 511 UMHC, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN55455, USA), Longini I M Jr, Seaholm S K and Hedin Å S. Simulation of mechanisms of viral interference in influzenza. International Journal of Epidemiology 1990, 19: 444–454. Biological interference among viral agents might have significant implications for disease prevention and therapy. Field data for influenza yield conflicting evidence concerning the independence of infection rates, or disease severity, for two co-circulating viruses. To examine the effects of several assumed modes of interference for influenza, simulations of a Monte Carlo micropopulation model of influenza epidemics have been performed. Model parameters were selected so that the simulated attack rates for each of two different viral strains matched actual field data. Rates of infection were compared for single agents and for two viruses with only behavioural interference. Other simulations included temporary immunity to the other virus for the duration of the infection, and/or reduced shedding of viral particles for dual infections. Simulated viral competition had little impact on epidemic severity, duration, or size distribution. Under the conditions studied, viral interference in natural populations would be difficult to infer from field observations of attack rates. Other simulations extended a partial immunity and/or reduced viral shedding during an infection with a second virus. These indicated that interference might be suggested by field data, but it could not be demonstrated conclusively. Still other simulations showed that for epidemics with much higher attack rates for both viruses, it would be relatively easy to demonstrate interference. However, in order to observe interference between influenza strains, it would be necessary to monitor on an almost daily basis, using a method of viral detection which would have to be both highly specific and also very sensitive.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidemiological models with age structure, proportionate mixing, and cross-immunityJournal of Mathematical Biology, 1989
- TECUMSEH STUDY OF ILLNESS. XIII. INFLUENZA INFECTION AND DISEASE, 1976–1981American Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- Simulation Studies of Influenza Epidemics: Assessment of Parameter Estimation and SensitivityInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1984
- Individuals Infected with Two Subtypes of Influenza A Virus in the Same SeasonThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1983
- INFLUENZAVIRUS INFECTIONS IN SEATTLE FAMILIES, 1975–1979American Journal of Epidemiology, 1982
- ESTIMATING HOUSEHOLD AND COMMUNITY TRANSMISSION PARAMETERS FOR INFLUENZAAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1982
- A STOCHASTIC MODEL FOR COMPETITION BETWEEN VIRAL AGENTS IN THE PRESENCE OF INTERFERENCEAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1968
- The mathematical analysis of concurrent epidemics of yaws and chickenpoxEpidemiology and Infection, 1966
- AN EXTENSION OF TEE REED-FROST EPIDEMIC MODEL FOR THE STUDY OF COMPETITION BETWEEN VIRAL AGENTS IN THE PRESENCE OF INTERFERENCE2American Journal of Epidemiology, 1964