Psycho-social intervention following attempted suicide: is there a case for better services?
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Review of Psychiatry
- Vol. 4 (1) , 15-22
- https://doi.org/10.3109/09540269209066298
Abstract
Deliberate self-harm services in the UK are frequently unplanned and delivered without a coherent view of their function. This is unfortunate because the evidence is that—contrary to popular misconception—psychiatric intervention after parasuicide is worthwhile. To improve this state of affairs, interventions need to be aimed at groups of patients with clearly identified needs, using techniques of known effectiveness which are delivered by specific deliberate self-harm teams. Health service planners have a duty: to develop such services; to monitor the phenomenon of deliberate self-harm in their locality; and to ensure inter-district and inter-agency collaboration in the evaluation of those services.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- WHAT HAPPENS TO ALCOHOLICS?The Lancet, 1983
- Psychological and social evaluation in cases of deliberate self-poisoning seen in an accident department.BMJ, 1982
- Management of patients after self-poisoning.BMJ, 1980
- Cheaper Care of ParasuicidesThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1979
- Evaluation of a Social Work Service for Self-Poisoning PatientsThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1978
- Self-poisoning: management of patients in Nottingham, 1976.BMJ, 1978
- The Repetitiveness of Self-poisoning and Self-injuryThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1977
- Evaluation of an after-care service for parasuicide (attempted suicide) patientsSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 1973
- Clinical and Social Predictors of Repeated Attempted Suicide: A Multivariate AnalysisThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1971
- AN INSTRUMENT FOR EVALUATING SUICIDE POTENTIAL: A PRELIMINARY STUDYAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1966