Focused Attention and the Detectability of Weak Gustatory Stimuli: Empirical Measurement and Computer Simulationsa

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Attentional processes can modulate the detectability of weak stimuli; for example, the detectability of visual or auditory signals can depend on whether attention is allocated to the appropriate spatial location (vision) or acoustic frequency (hearing). Earlier attempts in the first author's laboratory to find analogous effects of focused attention on the detectability of taste stimuli were equivocal, in part it seems because human gustatory sensitivity can fluctuate substantially over time, a serious problem when using procedures that track sensitivity (d') to a constant stimulus concentration. To circumvent this problem, we adopted an adaptive psychophysical procedure, the transformed up‐down method, using a 3‐down/1‐up rule to determine how the threshold to detect weak concentrations of sucrose and citric acid depended on whether the stimulus presented in a given two‐alternative, forced‐choice trial was expected or unexpected. The results showed threshold sensitivity to he slightly but consistently poorer when the test stimulus was unexpected (e.g., sucrose presented when citric acid was expected) than it was when the test stimulus was expected (e.g., sucrose presented when sucrose was expected).In this attentional paradigm, the unexpected stimulus must perforce be presented on only a small fraction of the trials. In selecting a procedure, we chose a 3‐down/1‐up adaptive rule rather than the more popular 2‐down/1‐up rule, a choice that turned out to be in line with results of Monte Carlo computer simulations. These simulations suggest that across a wide range of conditions (starting stimulus concentrations, step sizes), the variability in threshold measurements can he smaller with a 3‐down/1‐up rule than with a 2‐down/1‐up rule, even when the total number of trials is the same and not very great.

This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit: